Skip to main content

Supervisory Review Process (SRP)

The Pensions Authority’s Supervisory Review Process (SRP) is the structured mechanism through which it assesses the governance and compliance of Irish pension schemes. Introduced as a core element of the PA’s Supervision 2025–2029 strategy, the SRP provides a consistent, repeatable framework for supervisory engagement — replacing the previous ad-hoc desk review model with a structured, evidence-driven assessment.
The SRP is active from 2025. Every scheme is assessed against all six SRP pillars when reviewed. Trustees should treat SRP readiness as an ongoing governance obligation, not a one-time preparation exercise.

The Six Pillars

The SRP is structured around six pillars. For each pillar, the Pensions Authority assesses whether the trustee board has adequate governance arrangements in place and whether those arrangements are operating effectively in practice.
PillarWhat the PA Assesses
1. GovernanceQuality of policies, board meeting practice, KFH oversight, decision-making records
2. OperationsAdministration standards, member data accuracy, contribution processing, service provider oversight
3. Risk ManagementORA quality, risk appetite statements, risk register currency, trigger-event response
4. CommunicationsMember disclosure standards, benefit statement accuracy, material change notices
5. InvestmentInvestment Policy Statement quality, investment monitoring, cost transparency, manager oversight
6. Fees & ChargesTotal cost disclosure, value for money evidence, benchmarking against alternatives
The PA does not assess each pillar in isolation. Weaknesses in one pillar — for example, poor ORA quality — will inform its view of the overall governance standard of the scheme. A strong investment framework will not offset inadequate risk governance.

Pillar Breakdown

What the PA looks for:
  • A current, board-approved set of 11 written policies — reviewed and genuinely applied, not just adopted
  • Board meeting minutes that record substantive discussion, not just formal approval of agenda items
  • Evidence that all four Key Function Holders are appointed, notified to the PA, and reporting to the board
  • Conflict of interest declarations maintained and current for all trustees and KFHs
  • Trustee fit and proper assessments on file
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • Version-controlled policy registry with adoption dates, review history, and next review dates
  • Board minutes stored with timestamps
  • KFH registry with appointment records, fit and proper assessments, and PA notification confirmations
  • COI register with annual declaration status
What the PA looks for:
  • Accurate and complete member records (names, addresses, PPS numbers, contribution history)
  • Reconciled contribution records — payments matched to member accounts
  • Evidence that the scheme’s administrator is performing to contracted standards
  • Outsourcing register covering all service providers with written agreements in place
  • Data protection governance (DPA with data processors, GDPR compliance measures)
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • Member records with data quality validation
  • Contribution reconciliation workflow
  • Outsourcing register with provider details, SLA summaries, and PA notification status
  • Audit log of all data access and changes
What the PA looks for:
  • A completed Own Risk Assessment that is scheme-specific, current, and board-owned
  • Risk appetite statements that confirm whether each risk area sits within or outside tolerance
  • Evidence the ORA was discussed and approved at a board meeting (not just circulated for signature)
  • Trigger-event reviews when circumstances change
  • Outsourcing and DORA/ICT risks addressed within the ORA
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • ORA with per-category risk appetite statement, tolerance thresholds, and current status (Within / Approaching / Outside)
  • 32-entry risk library pre-seeded with IORP II reference risks across 8 categories
  • Alert system flagging risks outside or approaching tolerance
  • ORA version history with board approval dates
What the PA looks for:
  • Annual benefit statements issued to all active and deferred members within the required timeframe
  • Material change notices issued when required (scheme amendments, wind-up notices, significant investment changes)
  • Evidence of adequate member communication channels
  • ACS submitted where required (DB schemes)
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • Benefit statement generation and delivery tracking
  • Compliance calendar with communication deadlines
  • ACS wizard with submission tracking
What the PA looks for:
  • A current Investment Policy Statement that reflects actual investment strategy — not generic template language
  • Evidence of regular investment performance monitoring against the IPS objectives
  • Cost transparency — trustees must know what they are paying for investment management
  • Evidence that the trustee board actively oversees the investment manager, not passively delegates
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • Investment Policy document in the Policy Registry with adoption and review dates
  • VFM Dashboard with cost analysis and benchmarking
  • Board minutes recording investment review discussions
What the PA looks for:
  • Evidence that trustees have actively assessed whether scheme costs represent value for money for members
  • Benchmarking of scheme costs against comparable alternatives (master trusts, DC consolidation vehicles)
  • Disclosure of total costs to members (in line with the Cost Transparency Standard where applicable)
  • Link between cost governance and member outcome metrics
What PensionPortal.ai captures:
  • VFM Dashboard: sortable provider contracts, Current Scheme vs Master Trust benchmarking, member impact calculations (cost per member, cost ratio, 10-year fee drag)
  • VFM RAG summary card with evidence for board minutes

How PensionPortal.ai Maps to the SRP

SRP PillarPlatform FeatureEvidence Generated
GovernancePolicy Registry, KFH Registry, COI Register, Board MinutesPolicy adoption records, KFH appointment docs, COI declarations
OperationsMember Management, Outsourcing Register, Data QualityMember records, contribution reconciliation, outsourcing register
Risk ManagementOwn Risk Assessment (with appetite/tolerance), Risk LibraryORA with board sign-off, risk tolerance status, risk library entries
CommunicationsACS Wizard, Compliance Calendar, Benefit StatementsACS records, communication deadlines, statement delivery
InvestmentPolicy Registry (IPS), VFM DashboardIPS adoption, investment monitoring records
Fees & ChargesVFM DashboardCost benchmarking, member impact, VFM RAG status

SRP Evidence Pack Module

PensionPortal.ai includes a dedicated SRP Evidence Pack module to help trustees prepare for regulatory engagement.
1

Open the SRP Evidence Pack

Navigate to Schemes → [Your Scheme] → SRP Evidence Pack. You will see a card grid with one card per SRP pillar showing the current completion status.
2

Work through each pillar

Click any pillar card to open the assessment detail. For each pillar, you can:
  • Add evidence notes describing the governance in place
  • Upload or link to supporting documents
  • Log any PA findings received and assign remediation actions
3

Progress the status

Each pillar moves through Draft → In Progress → Submitted as you build out the evidence. The overview card updates automatically.
4

Track findings to closure

If the Pensions Authority issues findings following a review, log them in the findings tracker. Assign a responsible person, set a target date, and mark findings as closed when remediation is complete.
5

Export the Board Pack

When all pillars are at least In Progress, use the Export Board Pack button to generate a regulator-ready PDF summary of the scheme’s SRP evidence position. This can be provided to the PA on request or shared with the trustee board before a regulatory engagement.

Preparing for a PA Review

Trustees who maintain continuous SRP readiness will respond to any PA engagement quickly and confidently. The following items should be in place at all times:
  • All 11 written policies current (reviewed within last 3 years)
  • Board minutes for at least the last 12 months showing substantive discussion
  • KFH appointments and PA notifications complete and current
  • COI declarations up to date for all trustees and KFHs
  • ORA completed within the last 3 years (or since last trigger event)
  • Risk appetite statement and per-category tolerance status populated
  • ORA formally presented and signed by the board
  • Any risks Outside tolerance have documented remediation actions
  • Member records validated (no outstanding data quality exceptions)
  • Contribution records reconciled and current
  • Outsourcing register up to date with written agreements confirmed
  • IPS current and board-approved
  • VFM assessment completed and on file
  • VFM Summary Card at Amber or Green (Red requires board action)

Further Reading