Skip to main content

Supervisory Review Readiness

The Pensions Authority has the statutory power to review any Irish pension scheme’s compliance with IORP II at any time. Trustees who are unprepared for supervisory engagement — who cannot produce governance documentation on demand — face a compounded problem: the compliance gap they failed to address becomes immediately visible to the regulator. Supervisory review readiness is not about preparing a document pack when a review is announced. It is about maintaining a continuous, auditable compliance record so that any regulatory engagement can be met promptly and confidently.

The Pensions Authority’s Supervisory Approach

The Pensions Authority operates a risk-based supervisory model: supervisory resources are directed at schemes where governance failures present the greatest risk to member outcomes. However, risk-based supervision does not mean smaller schemes are immune — it means the Pensions Authority prioritises where it looks, not whether it looks.

Desk-Based Reviews

The primary supervisory tool. The Pensions Authority issues a structured information request to the trustee board requiring submission of governance documentation within a fixed timeframe (typically 20–30 working days). Adequacy of documentation is assessed by Pensions Authority staff. This is the most common form of regulatory engagement.

Scheme Visits (On-Site Inspections)

Inspectors from the Pensions Authority visit the scheme’s trustees or administrators to examine records and interview responsible persons. Inspectors have statutory powers under Section 18 of the Pensions Act 1990 to require access to premises and records.

Thematic Reviews

Sector-wide reviews targeting a specific compliance area. Recent thematic reviews have covered governance policy adequacy, ORA quality, and KFH appointment completeness. OMA compliance is expected to be a thematic priority in 2025–2026 given the April 2026 deadline.

Event-Triggered Supervision

Scheme events that trigger supervisory engagement: wind-ups, mergers, bulk transfers, member complaints, whistleblower reports, or failure to file the annual scheme return. Events that suggest governance weaknesses receive priority attention.

What Triggers a Review?

The Pensions Authority may initiate a review for any of the following reasons:
The annual scheme return, ACS submissions (for DB schemes), and Pensions Authority information requests that are not responded to will trigger escalating supervisory engagement. Non-response is treated as evidence of governance failure.
A complaint from a scheme member — about benefit calculation errors, communication failures, or investment performance — may trigger a review of the scheme’s broader governance arrangements. Member complaints are treated seriously even where they are ultimately unfounded.
Where the Pensions Authority identifies a sector-wide compliance issue (such as the OMA transition), it may conduct systematic outreach to all schemes in the affected category. OMA trustees should anticipate receiving correspondence from the Pensions Authority regarding the April 2026 deadline.
Wind-ups, mergers, and large-scale transfers attract regulatory scrutiny. The Pensions Authority will typically review governance documentation as part of its oversight of material scheme events.
The Pensions Authority collects data through annual scheme returns and other regulatory filings. Anomalies — funding shortfalls, large transfers, changes in KFH registrations — may trigger targeted follow-up.

What the Pensions Authority Looks For

In a desk-based review or scheme visit, the Pensions Authority expects to see:

Governance Documentation

  • A current, board-approved set of governance policies (risk management, investment, remuneration, contingency, outsourcing, internal audit, actuarial where applicable)
  • Evidence that policies are scheme-specific — not generic templates
  • Review dates confirming that each policy has been reviewed within the last three years (or at the time of any significant change)

Own Risk Assessment

  • A completed, dated, and board-signed ORA
  • Evidence that the ORA was discussed at a trustee board meeting (board minutes)
  • An ORA that covers all Pensions Authority-required risk categories with scheme-specific analysis
  • Date of last ORA confirming it is within the three-year review cycle (or that a trigger event has been addressed)

KFH Appointment Records

  • Appointment documentation for all four Key Function Holders (or three, if actuarial is not required)
  • Fit and proper assessment for each KFH
  • Pensions Authority notification for each KFH appointment
  • Evidence of ongoing KFH reporting to the trustee board (board minutes, KFH reports)

Outsourcing Agreements and Register

  • Written outsourcing agreements for all material service providers, meeting Article 31 IORP II requirements
  • An outsourcing register recording all providers, their functions, and PA notification status
  • For outsourced KFH roles: evidence of Pensions Authority notification

Member Communications and Data

  • Evidence of adequate member communications (benefit statements, material change notifications)
  • Evidence of data quality and data security governance (data strategy documentation)

Trustee Training and Fit & Proper

  • Records of trustee training undertaken
  • Current fit and proper assessments for all trustees and KFHs

The Evidence Pack: Supervisory Review Readiness

The concept of “supervisory review readiness” is simple: at any point, the trustee board should be able to produce a structured, complete, and time-stamped set of compliance documentation that answers every question the Pensions Authority is likely to ask. This is your evidence pack.
An evidence pack for a Pensions Authority desk review should contain:
  1. Scheme identification and trustee details (scheme registration number, trustee names and roles)
  2. KFH appointment records (appointment letters, fit and proper assessments, PA notification confirmations)
  3. Governance policy suite (all required policies, version-controlled, with board approval dates)
  4. Board meeting minutes (demonstrating governance in practice, at least 12 months)
  5. Own Risk Assessment (most recent, dated, board-signed)
  6. ACS (most recent, where applicable)
  7. Outsourcing register (all providers, agreements, PA notification status)
  8. KFH reports to the trustee board (annual reports from each KFH)
  9. Trustee training records (evidence of ongoing CPD)
  10. Member communication samples (benefit statements, material change notifications)

The Role of PensionPortal.ai

PensionPortal.ai is designed specifically to support supervisory review readiness. Every compliance action taken within the platform is time-stamped and stored in an immutable audit trail. At any point, trustees can generate a complete evidence pack formatted for Pensions Authority review.

Time-Stamped Compliance Record

Every action in PensionPortal.ai — policy approval, KFH appointment, ORA sign-off, board meeting minute — is recorded with a tamper-evident timestamp. The record is structured to demonstrate the sequence of governance activities.

Evidence Pack Export

One-click export of a regulator-ready evidence pack. The pack is structured to match the Pensions Authority’s desk review information request format, minimising the time required to respond to a supervisory inquiry.

Compliance Status Dashboard

Real-time dashboard showing compliance status across all IORP II obligations. Outstanding items, approaching deadlines, and overdue reviews are highlighted. Trustees can see at a glance whether the scheme is supervisory-review-ready.

Pensions Authority Notification Tracker

All notifications sent to the Pensions Authority are recorded, with dates and content. Trustees can confirm at any time that all required notifications are complete.

Pensions Authority Powers

If the Pensions Authority identifies compliance failures during a review, it has a graduated range of enforcement powers:
PowerStatutory BasisWhen Used
Direction to RectifySection 63C Pensions ActCompels trustees to address a specific compliance failure within a defined timeframe
ProhibitionSection 63D Pensions ActProhibits a trustee or service provider from acting in a specified capacity
Appointment of an AdministratorSection 63E Pensions ActReplaces trustee governance where the Authority has lost confidence in the board
ProsecutionSection 3 Pensions ActCriminal proceedings for certain statutory breaches; fines up to €50,000 on summary conviction
Wind-Up DirectionSection 48 Pensions ActCompulsory wind-up where scheme continuation poses serious risk to members
Publication of Enforcement ActionPensions Act, as amendedThe Pensions Authority publishes enforcement actions, creating public reputational consequences
The Pensions Authority’s publication of enforcement actions means that regulatory failures are not private matters. A direction or prohibition against a trustee who is a company director or senior executive will be visible to employers, clients, and counterparties. Compliance is not just a legal obligation — it is a professional and reputational imperative.

How to Prepare: A Trustee Checklist

Use this checklist to assess your scheme’s supervisory review readiness today:
  • Risk management policy: current, board-approved, reviewed within 3 years
  • Investment policy: current, board-approved, reviewed within 3 years
  • Remuneration policy: current, board-approved, reviewed within 3 years
  • Contingency plan: current, board-approved, reviewed within 3 years
  • Outsourcing policy (if applicable): current, board-approved
  • Internal audit policy: current, board-approved
  • Actuarial policy (if applicable): current, board-approved
  • Four KFHs appointed (or three where actuarial is not required)
  • Fit and proper assessments completed for each KFH
  • Pensions Authority notified of each KFH appointment
  • KFH annual reports received and minuted
  • ORA completed within the last 3 years
  • ORA covers all required risk categories
  • ORA formally presented to and signed off by the trustee board
  • ORA stored with time-stamp in the scheme’s compliance record
  • Written agreements in place for all material service providers
  • Outsourcing register maintained and current
  • Pensions Authority notified of any outsourced key functions
  • Board meeting minutes for at least the last 12 months
  • Minutes record attendance, decisions, and actions
  • Trustee training records maintained
  • Conflict of interest declarations current
If any item above is not checked, PensionPortal.ai can help you close the gap before the Pensions Authority engages. Contact us to assess your compliance position →